Skip to content

1950 to today

The Software Atlas

How software markets are born, consolidate, get disrupted and give rise to new ones. Ten chapters, 11 eras: what repeats, and where it doesn't.

eras
11eras
markets
55markets
companies
128companies
events
115events
emerging markets
19emerging markets
  1. Chapter 1 of 10 · 23 June 1969

    The day software got a price

    On 23 June 1969, IBM announced it would start charging for software separately from its machines. The Justice Department had filed its antitrust suit that January .

    Historians treat this as the birth of commercial software. Once IBM's software had a price, anyone could build a cheaper one, and a market existed.

    Our take

    It happens again and again, though not every time: a dominant platform stops giving something away, and a new market appears. It happened with browsers and with app stores, and it may be happening now between AI models and the apps built on them.

  2. Chapter 2 of 10 · Who survives a platform change?

    Eleven eras, one question

    Commercial software has gone through eleven eras, each built on a new technology and a new way of charging: licences for minicomputers, boxed retail for PCs, big licences plus maintenance for client-server, subscriptions for SaaS, metered usage for cloud, per-token pricing for AI models.

    The losers of each shift fail the same way. Lotus and WordPerfect were late to Windows. Netscape had the better browser but no distribution. Nokia and BlackBerry owned the phone, not the platform.

    BlackBerry shows the cost: its revenue fell from $19.9B in fiscal 2011 to $2.2B five years later .

    Our take

    Survivors tend to have done one of three things. They owned a layer the new platform still needed: Oracle's database, Microsoft's identity, Adobe's PDF. They disrupted themselves first: Office went subscription in 2011 , Creative Suite was retired in 2013 . Or they bought the challenger: GitHub for $7.5B , LinkedIn for $26.2B , Wiz for $32B .

    But losers did the same things. Sun owned Java and the servers the web ran on, and was sold to Oracle in 2010 . Informix owned a database and ended up inside IBM in 2001 . Novell bought WordPerfect to fight Office and sold it within two years at a fraction of the price, and IBM bought Lotus and never won back the desktop . So these are habits of survivors, not a recipe: this data can't show which of them caused survival, and the examples above were picked after the fact.

    The AI era has no casualties yet. In February 2026 investors priced them in anyway .

  3. Chapter 3 of 10 · About $1.27 trillion, depending on who counts

    How big is software?

    Gartner puts worldwide software spending at $1,271B in 2025 and $1,468B in 2026 . It revised the 2026 figure three times in one year .

    Synergy measures cloud more broadly and puts it at $143B in a single quarter of 2026, up 43% year on year . Two respected sources, the same-sounding market, figures more than twice apart.

    That's normal. Analysts disagree by two to three times on the same category because they draw its edges differently. Does CRM include marketing automation? Is a contact centre software or telephony?

    Our take

    So each market here states what it counts before it states a number. Where there's no published figure, we show a size range (under $5B up to over $150B) rather than a made-up point.

  4. Chapter 4 of 10 · Archetypes

    Ten ways to be a software company

    We sort companies into ten archetypes, from platform giants and suite consolidators to open-source vendors, private-equity roll-ups and AI-native newcomers. Each has its own advantage and its own way of failing.

    These are roles, not labels. Microsoft is a platform giant, a suite consolidator and, through GitHub and VS Code, one of the biggest product-led businesses in software.

    Our take

    Two moves drive most of the story. Specialists get absorbed into suites: Slack by Salesforce for $27.7B , Wiz by Google for $32B , Informatica by Salesforce for about $8B . And open-source companies change their licence, get forked, then partly walk it back: Elastic in 2021 , Redis in 2024 .

    In the chart, look at the clusters, not the ranking. Platform giants sit large and steady. AI natives sit small and fast-growing. PE-owned companies trade growth for cash.

    Some bubbles are group revenue, not software sales: Amazon's includes retail, Nvidia's and Apple's hardware, Google's and Meta's advertising. The chart labels them.

  5. Chapter 5 of 10 · Margins, retention, moats

    Why winners take most

    Software costs almost nothing to copy. Adobe's fiscal 2025 revenue was $23.77B against $2.55B in cost of revenue, a gross margin of about 89% . Atlassian grew 26% with a 20% free-cash-flow margin .

    Three forces compound that. Existing customers spend more each year, so revenue grows without new sales. Network, data and ecosystem effects make the most-used product the most valuable. And switching costs keep ERP, databases and health records in place for decades.

    Our take

    The radar scores each company 0–5 on seven moats against a published rubric, so you can argue with a specific score. Compare like with like: the tabs group incumbents that compete for the same buyers.

    What's new: AI inference costs real money for every query. If it pushes costs up, software's margin advantage shrinks. Public evidence on AI unit economics is still thin and mostly leaked .

  6. Chapter 6 of 10 · Cloud infrastructure, 2017–2026

    Is cloud getting more concentrated?

    Cloud is the one market with published share data. In mid-2017 AWS held 34% and Microsoft 11% . By mid-2026 AWS was at 28%, Microsoft 20% and Google 15% . Microsoft passed 20% in 2021 , peaked at 23% in late 2022 and has held 20–21% since .

    Our take

    Whether cloud is concentrating depends on how you measure it. The top three went from about half the market to two thirds. But HHI, the standard concentration index, peaked in 2022 and fell, because AWS lost share to its two nearest rivals rather than to small players. More oligopoly, less dominance.

    Our HHI is computed from published shares, treating the unreported rest as fragmented, so it's a lower bound. The 2023 US merger guidelines put the line for a concentrated market at 1,800 .

    Our take

    For most other markets, share data sits behind paywalls. Where a publisher has released vendor shares (CRM, databases, security, operating systems, ERP, AI model APIs), the Explore view shows them, gaps included.

  7. Chapter 7 of 10 · The two ways to make money in software

    Bundle, unbundle, repeat

    In 1990 Microsoft bundled Word, Excel and PowerPoint into Office and priced it below the standalone leaders. Within five years Lotus 1-2-3 and WordPerfect had both been sold .

    It ran the same play in 2017, shipping Teams inside Office 365 . Slack complained to the European Commission in 2020. In September 2025 the Commission accepted Microsoft's commitments to sell suites without Teams, at a lower price . By then Slack had belonged to Salesforce for four years .

    Unbundling happens when a suite serves some customers badly enough that a standalone product is worth buying. Re-bundling follows when stitching tools together becomes the bigger pain, which is Salesforce's pitch for its AI agents today .

    Our take

    The cycle is speeding up. Wiz went from founding to a $32B acquisition in six years . AI coding agents went from new category to a $60B acquisition offer in under three .

  8. Chapter 8 of 10 · The case for and against

    Is AI eating software?

    On 3 February 2026, days after an AI lab launched legal, sales and data-analysis plug-ins, Thomson Reuters fell nearly 18%, heading for its worst day on record. RELX, Wolters Kluwer and LSEG fell sharply too . Losses across affected sectors were estimated at about $285B .

    The bear case: AI agents don't need a seat licence, so per-seat revenue shrinks. Model labs move into applications. Customers build more in-house.

    The bull case comes from the filings. Salesforce grew 10% to $41.5B, with Agentforce at $800M in annual recurring revenue . Atlassian grew 26% to $6.57B . Microsoft sold more than 30 million paid Copilot seats . Gartner raised its 2026 software forecast to +15.5% .

    So far the money has landed mostly in infrastructure. Nvidia's revenue went from $27.0B in fiscal 2023 to $215.9B in fiscal 2026 .

    Our take

    So far, valuations have fallen but revenue hasn't. Watch seat counts, net retention and how much new business is priced on usage. The acquisitions chart shows where the money is going: into the layers incumbents don't yet own.

  9. Chapter 9 of 10 · 19 candidates, six signals

    Where the next markets come from

    New software markets tend to follow one of six signals: a platform shift, a key cost falling tenfold, a new interface or data source, a new regulation, a bloated incumbent coming apart, or a surge in funding and hiring.

    All six are firing now. AI inference costs fall about tenfold a year at the same capability . AI took close to half of global venture funding in 2025 . NIST published its first post-quantum encryption standards in 2024, starting a decade of mandatory migration . The EU's Digital Markets Act opened iPhones to rival app stores in 2024 .

    Six of the 19 candidates aren't about AI. They're driven by law or cost curves: mandatory e-invoicing, health-data APIs, battery prices down 90% since 2010, EU digital identity wallets.

    Not every announced shift arrives. Facebook renamed itself Meta in 2021 to build the metaverse and put $21.40B into Reality Labs in 2025 alone . That year headset shipments fell while display-less AI glasses sold more than 7 million units .

    Our take

    Bigger dots mean stronger evidence, not bigger markets. Every signal is sourced and scored 1–3. Timing guesses are the softest numbers here. A coding-agent company valued at $60B three years after it was founded is a reminder of how wrong they can be.

  10. Chapter 10 of 10 · A toy model, not a forecast

    Play the dynamics yourself

    Our take

    The patterns so far fit a few rules. Better products attract more customers, and network effects amplify that. Low switching costs increase churn. New entrants arrive. Now and then a platform shift resets the board.

    The simulator runs those rules. Every parameter is in the URL, so any run can be shared and reproduced exactly.

    Our take

    Try it. Turn network effects up and one firm takes over fast. Turn switching costs up and concentration builds slowly and never unwinds. Make platform shifts frequent and no leader lasts.

    It has no prices, regulators or acquisitions. Use it to build intuition, not to predict anything.

After ten chapters

What it adds up to

  1. 1

    Markets often appear when a platform stops giving something away

    IBM priced software separately in 1969 and an industry appeared. Browsers and app stores repeated the move, and AI models may be next. It's a frequent route to a new market, not the only one.

  2. 2

    Survivors' habits aren't a recipe

    Survivors often held a layer the new platform needed, disrupted themselves first, or bought the challenger. But Sun held Java and still sold out, and Novell bought WordPerfect and still lost. The habits are common to winners and losers alike.

  3. 3

    Concentration rotates more than it ratchets

    In cloud, the top three grew from half the market to two thirds while the leader lost share. More oligopoly and less dominance can happen at once, so no single measure tells the story.

  4. 4

    Bundling and unbundling alternate, faster each cycle

    Suites absorb specialists when stitching tools together becomes the pain, and specialists split off when a suite serves a segment badly. The gap between founding and a multi-billion exit keeps shrinking.

  5. 5

    AI has moved valuations more than revenues, so far

    Incumbents' reported revenue is still growing. The signals to watch are seat counts, net retention and how much new business is priced on usage or outcomes rather than seats.

  6. 6

    The next markets are as likely to come from law as from labs

    A third of the candidate markets are driven by regulation or falling costs rather than AI. Mandates like e-invoicing create buyers with no option to wait.

This is our reading of the evidence, not fact. The numbers are in Explore; the gaps are on the Contribute page.